Adobe has been a premier Macintosh developer for years. Ever since Pagemaker in 1985, Adobe and Apple have been joined at the hip for the mutual benefit of both companies. So what is the deal with Adobe and the Intel transition?
Adobe has an official statement on Intel based Macs.
Adobe said it would not deliver native Intel versions of currently shipping professional products and that customers would have to wait until future major releases--which could be more than one year away--for native Intel Mac support. While noting an upcoming release of a native Intel Mac beta of Lightroom, its newly introduced professional applications for photographers, Adobe refused to provide additional release dates on the native Intel versions of its applications, except to say it was moving its development to Apple's Xcode development platform to help ease the Intel transition and was focused on the next major releases of its professional, which due to planned development cycles would delay the release of any native Intel Mac support.
The company, however, reiterated its support for the new Intel-based Mac platform, noting that at last year's Apple's Worldwide Developer Conference, Adobe CEO Bruce Citizen expressed "strong support" for Apple's transition plans: “We think this is a really smart move on Apple’s part and we plan to create future versions of our Creative Suite for Macintosh that support PowerPC and Intel processors."
Ok, but what about all the other applications and why no patches to make them work in Rosetta. I am a Contribute user (a product Adobe got from Macromedia) and it does not work in Rosetta. This is ridiculous. The least Adobe should do for paying customers is to fix the problems to allow us to get by until they release the real deals.
Other developers have done this, it is time for Adobe to get in gear and make it right.